when composers refuse to die young: or how to avoid making aging a liablity amongst the artistically inclined
More comedy from the arts sector (or is that the creative industries (I forget which)):
I’d heard that the Young Composers’ Collective (founded 2003) had changed their name to the Irish Composers' Collective (allegedly) because its members, who grew not-young, did not want to relinquish the organization. It turns out, however, there’s a little tradition of doing this: the Association of Young Irish Composers (founded 1972) dropped the ‘Young’ and became the AIC some ten years later.
Anyone tempted to do a Bourdieuian analysis of this phenomenon?
update 11-08-14:I came across a piece from March 2004 re the Young Composers’ Collective. Full of moments of irony given the evolution of the AIC:
“I contacted a number of people to pitch the idea of starting a new organisation for young Irish composers…. Most of them agreed that more needed to be done for young composers in Ireland. I also contacted former members of the Association of Young Irish Composers which ceased activity in the 1970s. They all spoke positively of this organisation and lamented its demise….
“There is currently no support network for young Irish composers. The Association of Irish Composers (AIC) describes itself as Ireland’s representative body for composers…. It does little for young composers.”